Forget the One Percent

According to Oxford University’s OUR WORLD IN DATA, there’s significantly greater income inequality in the US than in all the other G7 countries. They have much more in common with countries under authoritarian rule. Russia and India (which is arguably democratic) exceed all countries in the European Union – as does China – in terms of income inequality. What’s more, almost ALL countries seem to be getting more unequal over time. But perhaps we should stop talking about the so-called ‘one percent. It is even more revealing to talk about the zero POINT one percent. The US leads the rest of the world in terms of the share of income earned by the zero POINT one percent.

Should we be asking whether Western-style capitalism is becoming the new feudalism?
But is capitalism the problem, or is it something else?
As human populations grow, are we genetically programmed to build hierarchies like our counterparts in the insect world?
Is the zero point one percent the evolutionary equivalent of the queen bees in our human hives?

From our perspective the increasing concentration of wealth in most countries has little to enlightened self interest or Adam Smith’s invisible hand. Greed and naked self interest seem to exist regardless of a society’s political and economic structure. In two countries that have resisted the worst effects of wealth and income inequality – Norway and Singapore – something else is undoubtedly at play there. Perhaps we should figure out what Norway and Singapore are doing right!


Relate Content:

Mapping the Ownership Network of Canada’s Billionaire Families

The planet has a billionaire problem. According to Oxfam, the world’s billionaires have more combined wealth than the bottom 60% of humanity — some 4.6 billion people. Given this obscene situation, calls are growing to rid the world of the billionaire class. But how do we make that happen?

We think that part of the answer is to understand billionaire’s network of control. Many billionaires are happy to have their net worth tracked by Forbes — they treat it as an accumulation horse race.1 But what billionaires don’t like is for people to understand how they wield power. On that front, behind ever billionaire is a complicated network of corporate control — a network that is seldom made public.

We’d like to change that. In this post, we’ll map the ownership network of ten billionaire families in Canada.

Why Canada? Well, because we’re Canadian researchers. But more importantly, because the statistics arm of the Canadian government has done the heavy lifting for us. For the last decade, Statistics Canada has maintained a database on the inter-corporate ownership of Canadian corporations — a database that it bills as a “unique directory of ‘who owns what’ in Canada”.

This corporate-ownership database contains a trove of information about how the rich wield power. In this post, we’ll begin to explore the data by mapping the ownership network of the following billionaire families:

  1. The McCain Family
  2. The Katz Family
  3. The Fidani Family
  4. The Richardson Family
  5. The Saputo Family
  6. The Rogers Family
  7. The Pattison Family
  8. The Irving Family
  9. The Weston Family
  10. The Thomson Family

Learn more

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

More Posts

Influencers and Experts

Mainstream news publications in Canada operate on very tight, near-zero profit margins, as total industry revenues have contracted sharply over the past two decades. But,

Academic Freedom or a Tax on Jobs

The grey (time) zone of academia The growing cohort of aging professors is raising intergenerational tensions on campuses The Editorial Board The Globe and Mail

Hunter-Gatherers vs City States

Were there parallels to contemporary micro-firms and today’s global corporate behemoths? by Rob Farrow, SBA (www.sba-canada.com) Both Dr. Luke Kemp – author of Goliath’s Curse

Built to Start, Not to Scale

by Rob Farrow, SBA (www.robfarrow.net) According to an article published in June of 2026 in The Globe and Mail, Canadian startups struggle to pass the

Canadian Tech Playbook

Here’s an enhanced, more polished version of your blog post—tightened for clarity, stronger flow, and a more provocative close, while keeping your core arguments intact:

VC-Backed FAAS

As a professional accountant with more than 3 decades of experience – including 5 years with the CRA as an auditor and 5 years with

About THE MAIN STREET JOURNAL

FIGHTING THE BIAS AGAINST SMALL BUSINESS

The Main Street Journal challenges the tendency to overestimate medium-sized and large businesses and overlook the smallest firms that make up Canada’s economy

THE REALITY OF CANADA'S SMALLEST BUSINESSES

Half of workers in business with fewer than 50 employees work for micro-businesses with 0-4 employees.

87%

of private-sector firms are self-employed or micro-business

0-4

employees defines a micro-business

99.7%

of Canadian firms are not large

WHY SMALL BUSINESSES ARE OVERLOOKED

BUSINESS SCHOOL

Focus on Fortune 500 companies

BUSINESS JOURNALISM

Follows firms with PR departments

SME CATEGORIES

Can hide the scale of micro-businesses

Our hope is to challenge our own perspectives and those of public-sector and corporate finance counterparts to deliver perspectives relevant to the ‘missing middle’ of Canada’s economy.